|
Toxic Trains in the Hot Zone
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
"Creating safe and
livable communities through informed citizen's."
For the victims. Hot Zone News, April 18th, 2009 ACCERT Editorial: A Tough Trip Through Paradise Whitefish residents worry about BNSF offers Sunday, April 12, 2009, Missoulian WHITEFISH - The Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad company has been quietly knocking on doors in a trendy Whitefish neighborhood, offering to buy homes and businesses that aren't for sale, while hinting that the ground beneath might be contaminated. “They're creating a lot of fear, but not providing many answers,” said Henry Roberts, whose Internet business owns a building in the neighborhood. “The guy shows up with an offer, suggests there may be something toxic underground, but then won't admit anything, won't say anything specific.” The immediate problem, Roberts said, isn't pollution. “The problem is secrecy.” It's no secret that BNSF owns a whole lot of toxic liability around the state. Nearly two dozen BNSF sites are on Montana's priority cleanup list, poisoned by spilled diesel fuel and chemical solvents. Historically, the emphasis has been on the diesel, but in recent years neighborhoods have found volatile organic compounds - trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, vinyl chloride - in their soils. Those chemicals can taint groundwater, and vapors from the chlorides can poison the homes and businesses above. Problem is, “we have no budget and no staffing to do the tests ourselves,” said Mary Ann Dunwell, spokesperson for the state Department of Environmental Quality. Her agency, she said, relies on the railroaders themselves to do the testing, which often focuses on company property and has not always proved sufficient for off-site neighbors. It's long been known that the Whitefish railyard is contaminated - diesel in the aquifer, chlorinated solvents in the groundwater, metals in the soil - but according to DEQ project manager Kate Fry, “there's nothing to suggest there's any contamination in the neighborhood BNSF wants to buy, according to the data we have.” Except, of course, the suggestions recently made by the company to local landowners. The data DEQ relies upon was collected by the company, Fry said, just as it was in Havre, where diesel contamination was discovered in 1985 at a BNSF fueling facility. There, neighbors initiated their own off-site tests and found a plume of contamination that BNSF had failed to locate. They sued, and the company began buying and razing dozens of houses. Yet despite that history and BNSF's hints to Whitefish landowners, “we cannot require them to do additional testing without a strong suspicion of contamination,” Fry said, something based in science. But any scientific evaluation would have to be conducted by the neighbors, because BNSF cannot be compelled, and DEQ, as Fry said, “has neither the staff nor the resources, and that kind of testing costs a lot of money. Right now, we have no way of knowing the whole story.” In February, a state court ordered BNSF to pay the cleanup bills on a site near Kalispell, even though the company does not currently own the property. And in 2007, the state Supreme Court cleared the way for Montana residents to sue BNSF for cleanup, and not just to the “health-based” threshold that DEQ uses but to the land's “original state.” That same ruling allows residents to capture the full cleanup cost, which often is well beyond the value of the property. “The railroad's financial exposure,” DEQ attorney Bill Kirley said, “increased substantially with that ruling.” “Burlington Northern could be on the hook for a million-dollar cleanup on a $100,000 property,” added Whitefish City Attorney John Phelps. “If I were them, I'd be buying properties, too.” CN plans oil sands 'pipeline on rail' April 9th, 2009, Financial Post.comCanadian National Railway Co. has developed a
transformative strategy it calls the "Pipeline on Rail" that can move
oil-sands production quickly and cheaply to markets in North America or
Asia. Currently, pipelines charge $17.95 per barrel to ship oil from Alberta to the U. S. Gulf Coast. Estimates are that the increase in pipeline capacity to four million barrels a day from the oil sands to the Gulf of Mexico would cost about $25-billion to build and take years to complete.CN could gear up its capacity to ship by rail up to four million barrels a day of oil at less cost and more quickly, bypassing the need to finance huge pipelines. By the end of this year, the company will be shipping 10,000 barrels daily from producers whose reserves are now stranded. "Not enough pipeline capacity exists today to move bitumen [gooey oil-sands production], diluted bitumen [called dilbit] or synthetic crude," Jim Foote, CN's executive vice-president of sales and marketing, said in an interview this week. "We can get their products today to market using the concept of a pipeline on rail and move it directly either into the U. S. or to the West Coast [for shipment to Asia], which creates the flexibility. It means smaller producers are not just tied to a refinery down in Texas." Lack of training blamed for Prince George train fire Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The Canadian PressA CN Rail train crash and
explosion in Prince George
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||